IndyCar In-Car Cameras
Watch In-car cameras from some of the fastest racers in the world!
Duration : 0:3:21
Some other resources include links to Atlanta houses, and also the great option to watch Nigerian movies online. We also have information about Miami Houses here. Top Christmas Gifts for 2009
Tags: $500, andretti, camera, castroneves, champcar, danica, dixon, exciting, fast, foyt, george, helio, incar, indy, indycar, Patrick, racing, rutherford, tony, unser
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Slow? I thought …
Slow? I thought 2009 F1 cars were sped up a little bit eve though they attemted to slow them down to make the field more even.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
OK, thanks for the …
OK, thanks for the info!
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
2004 was before F1 …
2004 was before F1 made more aerodynamical reforms, also they were running V10 engines at that point in time, until they changed them to V8s just after that. So, it was after years of perfecting downforce and aero work, and they had more powerful V10s, that is why that is one of the fastest years in F1.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Ok, I’ve to agree …
Ok, I’ve to agree with you now. But what about e.g. 2004 F1? Almost all records on actual F1 tracks belongs to one of 2004 F1 car. What about them???
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Well, that is …
Well, that is incorrect, 2009 F1 cars have less downforce, so they would be far faster on a straight than last years cars. In fact, they would be much faster than an IndyCar if they were set up to run an oval. They have more power, so if you take downforce off of the front and rear, and also lengthen the gear ratios, it would be faster on an oval. The only reason F1 cars do not achieve higher speeds on straights is because they are set up for acceleration due to less straights.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Yea, agreed. By the …
Yea, agreed. By the way 2009 F1 cars are relatively slow - 2008 cars would be better for oval
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
2009 F1 cars would …
2009 F1 cars would go really fast on an oval because of the downforce reduction but I am not sure if the earlier ones could keep up with Indycars on an oval…
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Not nowadays F1 …
Not nowadays F1 cars - didn’t you know that they can go on ceiling when going over 120kph??? They wouldn’t fly
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
“That was a perfect …
“That was a perfect lap, perfect lap. Give me 5 more of those!”
lol… he thinks it’s the easiest thing on Earth!!!
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
if there weren’t …
if there weren’t any chicanes at Monza the cars would fly!!!!
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
SOMETHING GOOD WILL …
SOMETHING GOOD WILL HAPPEN TO U AT 9:10 SOMEONE WILL CALL YOU OR TALK TO YOU ONLINE AND SAY I LOVE YOU OR ASK YOU OUT BUT HERES THE CATCH Send To 3 vids
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
too fast track for …
too fast track for F1 car*, ofc, sorry
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Oh my GOT, …
Oh my GOT, Indianapolis oval is TOO fast for F1! WHAT THE F*CK !? There’s no TOO fast car for F1 car… Maybe the should limit F1 max speed to 250 kph… What kind of idiots… I know, I understand A. Senna, Jim Clark, J. Villenevue… But this was earlier! Now is now, just build more safe cars! And remove these chicanes from Monza!
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
If IRL would be …
If IRL would be shown on Polish TV, I won’t watch each F1 race… Indy is much better because of no morons - I mean FIA officials… This racing is like it was 50 years ago, but more safe and much faster! Someone said that F1 cars are going round micky-mouse tracks… Yes, it’s true… This is the biggest problem of F1 nowadays. What a d**k-head added IDIOTIC chicanes on Monza? Or Spa? Has shortened Interlagos? Or Kyalami? FIA dumbasses! Racing track MUST fast for F1 car! Its not WTCC or smthng!
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Well those people …
Well those people don’t care there is a world outside of America.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
I rather be …
I rather be watching Indycar than F1. It just feels more exciting.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Unless you claim …
Unless you claim you drive one of these cars in real-life, don’t come here ing that it takes no skill to turn left! The cars are running flat-out. And it just takes a slight lapse of concentration to spin your car.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
lol, you think so? …
lol, you think so? F1 is still a great serie, but overtaking will never happen a lot.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
yea but its just …
yea but its just left, left, left not hard corners so you can just focus getting good speed and overtake so so still no skill needed….
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
lol!
Do u know …
lol!
Do u know how focused you have to be to do that over 200 times! going 3 wide at times and side by side for laps!
Gimme a ing break dude
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Its really ain’t …
Its really ain’t that hard to fallow the guy in front of you and having you car being half a computer helps alot. Im not saying F1 sucks its just theres really no passing. Nascar at talladega or indy at texas cant be beat. How can F1 beat 3 wide racing please tell me” You sound like a redneck” how long did it take you to think of that one. You really havent seen nascar latly, its starting to fill with rich snobs
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
dude STFU………. …
dude STFU………..NASCAR will never compare to F1. NASCAR is best drivers of America…..F1 is best drivers of the ENTIRE ING WORLD! man u look like a ing redneck moron right about now.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
dude STFU………. …
dude STFU………..NASCAR will never compare to F1. NASCAR is best in America…..F1 is best iof the ENTIRE ING WORLD. man u look like a ing redneck moron right about now.
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
no match for f1 but …
no match for f1 but more overtakings are fun, we are going to se that in f1 next year
June 8th, 2009 at 12:34 pm
seriosly they drive …
seriosly they drive aground a circle good overtaking sure but no skill needed?